U.S. Appeals Court Affirms Parody Was Clear Fair Use

CHICAGO — In an important ruling involving parody productions, a federal appeals court affirmed yesterday that a "South Park" episode called “What What (In the Butt)” did not infringe on the YouTube video of the same name.

Yesterday's ruling is significant for various sectors of the U.S. film business including the adult industry, which have relied on parodies to add to the bottom line. The decision underscores the ability for judges to dismiss cases early on because of abusive copyright claims. 

In the case, plaintiff Brownmark Films sued Viacom and Comedy Central, alleging copyright infringement over the 2008 "South Park" episode, but a federal judge promptly dismissed the case, ruling it was a clear case of fair use and that early dismissal of the case was correct.

Brownmark later appealed to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that fair use cannot be decided on a motion to dismiss, no matter how obvious.  

Viacom fought back, taking its case to a federal appeals court, saying that dismissal in the early stages of litigation is imperative to protect free speech and discourage frivolous litigation.

The 7th Circuit agreed with Viacom, calling the lower court’s decision “well-reasoned and delightful.” 

"We hold that the district court could properly decide fair use on [an early motion]," the appeals court said. "Despite Brownmark’s assertions to the contrary, the only two pieces of evidence needed to decide the question of fair use in this case are the original version of 'What What (In the Butt)' and the episode at issue.

"When the two works in this case are viewed side-by-side, the 'South Park' episode is clearly a parody of the original 'What What (In the Butt)' video, providing commentary on the ridiculousness of the original video and nature of certain YouTube videos."

This case involves one "South Park" episode entitled “Canada On Strike,” which satirized the 2007-2008 Writers’ Guild of America strike, inexplicably popular viral videos and the difficulty of monetizing Internet fame. In the episode, the nation of Canada goes on strike, demanding a share of the “Internet money” they believe is being generated by viral videos and other online content.

The South Park Elementary schoolboys — Cartman, Stan, Kyle and Butters — decide to create a viral video in order to accrue enough “Internet money” to buy off the striking Canadians. The boys create a video, “What What (In The Butt),” in which Butters sings a paean to anal sex. The video is a huge hit, but the boys are only able to earn “theoretical dollars.”

This "South Park" parody includes the same title as the original Brownmark Films video, featuring an adult male singing and dancing in tight pants. The "South Park" version stars Butters, a naive nine-year old, in a variety of costumes — dressed as a teddy bear, astronaut and daisy.

The court pointed to the Copyright Act of 1976, which sets forth four, nonexclusive factors that a court must consider in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a fair use: (1) the purpose and character of the use; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

"We consider each factor in turn, ultimately agreeing with the district court’s analysis and findings," the appeals court said.

With the decision, the court noted that its ruling and others like it are important not only to protect speech, but also in fighting back against copyright trolls, who depend on the threat of legal costs to encourage people to settle cases even though they might have legitimate defenses.  

The court said that plaintiff Brownmark Films' litigation strategy in correspondence with defendants gave the appearance of a copyright troll.

"[I]nfringement suits are often baseless shakedowns," the court said. "Ruinous discovery heightens the incentive to settle rather than defend these frivolous suits."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation backed Viacom with an amicus brief in the case at the 7th Circuit.

The case is Brownmark Films vs. Comedy Partners, No. 11-2620.  

View 7th Circuit ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

'White-Hot' Party Set to Kick Off XBIZ Miami

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the annual White-Hot Party, the official opening bash of XBIZ Miami, is set for Monday, May 19, at Mynt Lounge in South Beach.

AORTA Films Adds New Team Members

AORTA Films has added three industry veterans to its team.

Sabien DeMonia Stars in New Brazzers Interactive Release

Sabien DeMonia stars in a new interactive POV scene for Brazzers, titled “Dancing My Clothes Off.”

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for March, April

AEBN has announced the top search terms for March and April from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Takedown Piracy Adds 'Search Max' Feature

Takedown Piracy has launched Search Max, a search engine for detecting, verifying, and removing Google infringements.

Sex Workers' Group Fights Proposed Swedish Ban on 'Remote' Sexual Services

The European Sex Workers’ Rights Alliance (ESWA) has launched a campaign against a Swedish government proposal to expand current laws against purchasing sexual services to apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Nicole Doshi, Scarlett Alexis Topline Latest 'Squirting Lesbians' From Sweetheart Video

Nicole Doshi and Scarlett Alexis headline the eighth volume of "Squirting Lesbians" from Mile High Media's studio imprint Sweetheart Video.

FSC: Arizona Governor Signs Controversial Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition has released a statement regarding Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs signing the state's age verification bill into law.

NCOSE Sues 4 Adult Websites Under Kansas Age Verification Law

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), a conservative anti-pornography organization, has sued four adult websites in Kansas under the state's age verification law.

Blake Blossom Toplines 'No Going Back' Sequel From Bellesa

Blake Blossom headlines the second volume of "No Going Back" from Bellesa Films.

Show More